Sharia Law is a set of 7th-Century rules created by men to suppress and control women and abuse gays.
There is absolutely no place for that type of oppression in a free society.
However, Liberals are suddenly embracing Sharia Law, calling it “beautiful” and “empowering.”
Ok let’s see if they are right:
As reported by Truth Feed, Sharia Law, practiced in it’s most “moderate forms” in places like Saudi Arabia is the reason women can’t drive, must have a male escort when leaving the house, and dress in a cloth “garbage bag” to cover themselves so men don’t feel jealous.
Women in so-called “moderate Muslim” countries like Saudi Arabia are imprisoned for being rape victims, simply because they must have tempted a man.
As you can see, that is Sharia Law and there is absolutely nothing “empowering” and “beautiful” here.
Via US Herald:
The psychological links between Islamic terror and Sharia law are such that any Muslim who adheres to the 7th century code should be deported, says former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
“Let me be as blunt and direct as I can be. Western Civilization is in a war,” Gingrich said on Fox News following a recent Islamic terror attack that killed 84 people in Nice, France. “Sharia is incompatible with Western Civilization. We need to be fairly relentless about defining who our enemies are.”
Watch the video below:
While Gingrich makes the forceful argument that U.S. immigration policy should be vehemently against Sharia for the sake of protecting society, he seems to have no problem with “moderate” Muslims who are entering the country and settling.
So how do we test “moderate” Muslims with any degree of truth or reliability? Would an oath of allegiance or a religious litmus test resolve the dilemma?
Our military exploits across the Middle East have taught how easy it is for jihadists to hide away in so-called moderate communities that offer them protection.
It’s the so-called moderate Muslims that are calling for their own “safe zones” in Australia and the U.S., and it’s the so-called moderate Muslims that rise up with threats of violence over a billboard in Indianapolis that criticizes the prophet Mohammed.
It basically comes down to numbers and demographics. As long as Muslim communities remain small they will remain peaceful for the most part and adhere to the rules of the larger society. As their numbers grow, however, they begin to organize politically, voting in blocs while demanding that society bend to their rules and demands.
We only have to look at the city of London, England, with its non-white majority and its Muslim mayor, and its generally hostile attitude toward native Britons in order to begin to understand the dangers posed by multiculturalism.
The only people that seem to demand that Western countries be continually flooded with Third World migrants are the same people who seek to overturn and replace Western civilization entirely.